V Skill HF-D3.4-004 transversal 7 kompetenser

moral judgement

Naming the interests, standards and consequences involved in a dilemma, making the trade-off traceable and substantiating the decision taken.

Hur hrmforce mäter detta

Scenario with response options, scored on knowledge or behavioural tendency.

Nivå	Beteende på denna nivå
N1 Guided	Puts a case of moral doubt to the manager and names which rule or agreement is in tension. works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task
N3 Proficient	Works out a dilemma along the interests of those involved and applicable standards, and justifies the chosen solution in the team. sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process
N5 Leading	Develops the frameworks the organisation uses for ethical questions and guides decision making in cases with major societal consequences. sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession

N2 och N4 är medvetet inte förankrade. Bedömarna placerar dem mellan förankringarna, i enlighet med konventionen O*NET.

Dessa kompetenser ärver bedömningsvägen och beteendeankarna för detta konstrukt.

T	Kompetens	Definition	Prognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030
V	Formulating a dilemma explicitly Framing a dilemma	Writing down a difficult choice as two options that each harm a standard or an interest.	rising
V	Naming the interests and standards involved Identifying stakes	Listing who has an interest in a dilemma and which rules, codes or values are at play.	rising
V	Preparing a moral case deliberation Moral case deliberation	Preparing a case, method and participants for a joint conversation about a moral question.	rising
V	Recording a trade-off traceably Documenting reasoning	Writing down the steps of a moral trade-off so that another person can follow the choice.	rising
V	Naming consequences of options for those involved Consequence analysis	Describing per option what it means for the client, colleague, organisation and wider environment.	rising
V	Substantiating a decision in a dilemma Justifying decisions	Explaining why the chosen option outweighs the rejected one and which harm remains.	rising
K	Testing against a professional code Professional code	Checking an intended action against the professional code or rules of the occupation before acting.	stable