+31 (0)88 88 321 88
V Skill HF-D1.6-004 transversal 8 kompetenser

Reflecting on own thinking errors

Examines afterwards how own assumptions, preferences and rules of thumb steered a judgement and adjusts the own way of working.

Hur hrmforce mäter detta

Bedömningsmetod
Structured interview · rho 0.42 (SD 0.19)
hrmforce instrument
Big Fifty, 360 Feedback, Development Review
Kompetens (50-ramverk)
Self-awareness
Utbildningsbarhet
high
Prognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030
rising

Behaviour-based interview with fixed questions and a rating scale per question.

Beteendeankare

NivåBeteende på denna nivå
N1 Guided States after feedback which assumption was wrong and what will go differently in the approach next time.
works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task
N3 Proficient Analyses an own mistake for thinking steps, names the bias that played a part and arranges counterargument for next judgements.
sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process
N5 Leading Makes discussing thinking errors normal in the organisation, shares own miscalculations and builds counterargument into decision making.
sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession

N2 och N4 är medvetet inte förankrade. Bedömarna placerar dem mellan förankringarna, i enlighet med konventionen O*NET.

Grundläggande kompetenser

Dessa kompetenser ärver bedömningsvägen och beteendeankarna för detta konstrukt.

TKompetensDefinitionPrognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030
V Recognising confirmation bias
Confirmation bias · Selective evidence
Notices that mainly confirming evidence is sought and therefore deliberately looks for counterexamples. rising
V Recognising anchoring
Anchoring bias · Anchor adjustment
Notices that a first figure or proposal steers own judgement and deliberately corrects for it. rising
V Recognising the availability heuristic
Availability heuristic · Recency bias
Notices that recent or striking cases distort judgement about likelihood and magnitude. rising
V Testing own assumptions with others
Seeking challenge · Devil's advocate
Puts own assumptions to someone with a different interest or field and asks for challenge. rising
V Seeking feedback on own judgement
Feedback on reasoning · Judgement review
Asks specifically for feedback on own reasoning and uses it to adjust the judgement. rising
V Writing a reflection report
Reflection report · Reflective writing
Describes in writing which choices were made, their effect and what will be different next time. stable
V Reconstructing reasoning afterwards
Reasoning reconstruction · Decision debrief
Retraces after a decision which steps led to the conclusion and where the reasoning was weak. rising
V Recognising groupthink in oneself
Groupthink · Conformity bias
Notices own opinion drifting with the group and still puts the dissenting view forward. rising
Gratis demo