Staying the course under pressure
Holding to the agreed course when facing criticism, disappointing results or outside pressure, while checking whether an adjustment is genuinely needed on the merits.
Hur hrmforce mäter detta
- Bedömningsmetod
- Personality questionnaire · rho 0.40 (SD 0.15)
- hrmforce instrument
- Big Fifty, Mental Resilience (4C), 360 Feedback
- Kompetens (50-ramverk)
- Perseverance
- Utbildningsbarhet
- medium
- Prognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030
- stable
Self-report of behavioural preferences. At hrmforce the Big Fifty and the 15PF.
Detta är ett urvalskriterium, inte ett kortsiktigt utvecklingsmål. Lägg inte upp någon tre månaders utvecklingsplan för detta.
Beteendeankare
| Nivå | Beteende på denna nivå |
|---|---|
| N1 Guided | Keeps following the agreed working method when contradicted and reports doubt or discomfort to the manager. works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task |
| N3 Proficient | Explains, when figures disappoint, why the course is maintained and which signals would lead to an adjustment. sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process |
| N5 Leading | Sustains the multi-year course of the organisation under public or political pressure and openly accounts for deviations to board and supervisors. sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession |
N2 och N4 är medvetet inte förankrade. Bedömarna placerar dem mellan förankringarna, i enlighet med konventionen O*NET.
Grundläggande kompetenser
Dessa kompetenser ärver bedömningsvägen och beteendeankarna för detta konstrukt.
| T | Kompetens | Definition | Prognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030 |
|---|---|---|---|
| G | Defending the course under criticism Defending direction | Keeps explaining and substantiating the chosen direction when employees, clients or executives criticise it. | stable |
| G | Holding priorities under time pressure Priority discipline | Does not release agreed priorities when incidents, ad hoc requests or peak workload compete for attention. | stable |
| G | Explaining an unpopular choice Explaining unpopular decisions | Explains a decision that lands badly, names the trade off and engages in conversation with those affected. | stable |
| G | Adjusting course with substantiation Substantiated course change | Changes course only on substantive grounds and makes clear which new insight caused the change. | stable |
| G | Acting consistently with own words Leading by example | Acts in line with the frames and priorities imposed on the team, also when that is uncomfortable. | stable |
| G | Keeping policy stable amid mixed signals Policy consistency | Prevents shifting policy by weighing contradictory signals before adjusting an agreed line of action. | stable |