+31 (0)88 88 321 88
G Behavioural competence HF-D4.1-004 transversal 6 kompetenser

Staying the course under pressure

Holding to the agreed course when facing criticism, disappointing results or outside pressure, while checking whether an adjustment is genuinely needed on the merits.

Hur hrmforce mäter detta

Bedömningsmetod
Personality questionnaire · rho 0.40 (SD 0.15)
hrmforce instrument
Big Fifty, Mental Resilience (4C), 360 Feedback
Kompetens (50-ramverk)
Perseverance
Utbildningsbarhet
medium
Prognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030
stable

Self-report of behavioural preferences. At hrmforce the Big Fifty and the 15PF.

Detta är ett urvalskriterium, inte ett kortsiktigt utvecklingsmål. Lägg inte upp någon tre månaders utvecklingsplan för detta.

Beteendeankare

NivåBeteende på denna nivå
N1 Guided Keeps following the agreed working method when contradicted and reports doubt or discomfort to the manager.
works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task
N3 Proficient Explains, when figures disappoint, why the course is maintained and which signals would lead to an adjustment.
sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process
N5 Leading Sustains the multi-year course of the organisation under public or political pressure and openly accounts for deviations to board and supervisors.
sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession

N2 och N4 är medvetet inte förankrade. Bedömarna placerar dem mellan förankringarna, i enlighet med konventionen O*NET.

Grundläggande kompetenser

Dessa kompetenser ärver bedömningsvägen och beteendeankarna för detta konstrukt.

TKompetensDefinitionPrognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030
G Defending the course under criticism
Defending direction
Keeps explaining and substantiating the chosen direction when employees, clients or executives criticise it. stable
G Holding priorities under time pressure
Priority discipline
Does not release agreed priorities when incidents, ad hoc requests or peak workload compete for attention. stable
G Explaining an unpopular choice
Explaining unpopular decisions
Explains a decision that lands badly, names the trade off and engages in conversation with those affected. stable
G Adjusting course with substantiation
Substantiated course change
Changes course only on substantive grounds and makes clear which new insight caused the change. stable
G Acting consistently with own words
Leading by example
Acts in line with the frames and priorities imposed on the team, also when that is uncomfortable. stable
G Keeping policy stable amid mixed signals
Policy consistency
Prevents shifting policy by weighing contradictory signals before adjusting an agreed line of action. stable
Gratis demo