+31 (0)88 88 321 88
G Behavioural competence HF-D1.2-003 transversal 8 skills

Judgement under uncertainty

Weighs the possible explanations when data are missing or conflicting and reaches a reasoned judgement while stating the remaining uncertainty.

How hrmforce measures this

Assessment method
Situational Judgement Test · rho 0.12 (SD 0.11)
hrmforce instrument
Big Fifty, Competency Check
Competency (50-framework)
Judgment
Trainability
medium
Demand outlook 2026 to 2030
rising

Scenario with response options, scored on knowledge or behavioural tendency.

This is a selection criterion, not a short-term development goal. Do not put a three-month development plan on it.

Behavioural anchors

LevelBehaviour at this level
N1 Guided Indicates which data are missing when in doubt and proposes a provisional judgement to the manager.
works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task
N3 Proficient Forms a judgement on incomplete files, names the assumptions used and states which new fact would change that judgement.
sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process
N5 Leading Judges in situations of high uncertainty and opposing interests, accounts for this publicly and revises the judgement on new evidence.
sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession

N2 and N4 are deliberately not anchored. Raters place them between the anchors, following the O*NET convention.

Underlying skills

These skills inherit the assessment route and the behavioural anchors of this construct.

TSkillDefinitionDemand outlook 2026 to 2030
G Making assumptions explicit
Surfacing assumptions
States which assumptions underlie a judgement and indicates how firm those assumptions are. rising
G Stating uncertainty explicitly
Communicating uncertainty
Indicates with a conclusion what is unknown and which caveat therefore belongs to the judgement. rising
G Estimating a range
Range estimation · Confidence interval
Gives a lower and upper bound instead of a single figure and justifies how those were set. rising
G Weighing conflicting signals
Weighing conflicting evidence
Weighs sources and signals that contradict each other and explains why one deserves more weight. rising
G Revising a provisional judgement
Updating judgement
Adjusts an earlier judgement as soon as new data warrant it and records that change. rising
G Justifying professional judgement
Professional judgement · Reasoned justification
Explains which data, standards and trade offs a judgement rests on and where its limits lie. rising
G Seeking a second opinion when in doubt
Second opinion · Peer consultation
Puts a doubtful case to a colleague or expert before a decision is made final. rising
G Acting when data are missing
Acting on incomplete information
Chooses a defensible next step when information is incomplete and names what must still be checked. rising
Free demo