G Behavioural competence HF-D1.2-003 transversal 8 kompetenser

Judgement under uncertainty

Weighs the possible explanations when data are missing or conflicting and reaches a reasoned judgement while stating the remaining uncertainty.

Hur hrmforce mäter detta

Scenario with response options, scored on knowledge or behavioural tendency.

Detta är ett urvalskriterium, inte ett kortsiktigt utvecklingsmål. Lägg inte upp någon tre månaders utvecklingsplan för detta.

Nivå	Beteende på denna nivå
N1 Guided	Indicates which data are missing when in doubt and proposes a provisional judgement to the manager. works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task
N3 Proficient	Forms a judgement on incomplete files, names the assumptions used and states which new fact would change that judgement. sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process
N5 Leading	Judges in situations of high uncertainty and opposing interests, accounts for this publicly and revises the judgement on new evidence. sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession

N2 och N4 är medvetet inte förankrade. Bedömarna placerar dem mellan förankringarna, i enlighet med konventionen O*NET.

Dessa kompetenser ärver bedömningsvägen och beteendeankarna för detta konstrukt.

T	Kompetens	Definition	Prognos för efterfrågan 2026–2030
G	Making assumptions explicit Surfacing assumptions	States which assumptions underlie a judgement and indicates how firm those assumptions are.	rising
G	Stating uncertainty explicitly Communicating uncertainty	Indicates with a conclusion what is unknown and which caveat therefore belongs to the judgement.	rising
G	Estimating a range Range estimation · Confidence interval	Gives a lower and upper bound instead of a single figure and justifies how those were set.	rising
G	Weighing conflicting signals Weighing conflicting evidence	Weighs sources and signals that contradict each other and explains why one deserves more weight.	rising
G	Revising a provisional judgement Updating judgement	Adjusts an earlier judgement as soon as new data warrant it and records that change.	rising
G	Justifying professional judgement Professional judgement · Reasoned justification	Explains which data, standards and trade offs a judgement rests on and where its limits lie.	rising
G	Seeking a second opinion when in doubt Second opinion · Peer consultation	Puts a doubtful case to a colleague or expert before a decision is made final.	rising
G	Acting when data are missing Acting on incomplete information	Chooses a defensible next step when information is incomplete and names what must still be checked.	rising