V Skill HF-D1.6-004 transversal 8 umiejętności
Reflecting on own thinking errors
Examines afterwards how own assumptions, preferences and rules of thumb steered a judgement and adjusts the own way of working.
W jaki sposób serwis hrmforce to mierzy
- Metoda oceny
- Structured interview · rho 0.42 (SD 0.19)
- hrmforce narzędzie
- Big Fifty, 360 Feedback, Development Review
- Kompetencje (50-ramowe)
- Self-awareness
- Możliwość szkolenia
- high
- Prognoza popytu na lata 2026–2030
- rising
Behaviour-based interview with fixed questions and a rating scale per question.
Kotwice behawioralne
| Poziom | Zachowanie na tym poziomie |
|---|---|
| N1 Guided | States after feedback which assumption was wrong and what will go differently in the approach next time. works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task |
| N3 Proficient | Analyses an own mistake for thinking steps, names the bias that played a part and arranges counterargument for next judgements. sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process |
| N5 Leading | Makes discussing thinking errors normal in the organisation, shares own miscalculations and builds counterargument into decision making. sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession |
N2 i N4 celowo nie zostały przypisane do konkretnych punktów odniesienia. Oceniający umieszczają je pomiędzy punktami odniesienia, zgodnie z konwencją O*NET.
Podstawowe umiejętności
Umiejętności te dziedziczą ścieżkę oceny oraz punkty odniesienia behawioralne tej konstrukcji.
| T | Umiejętności | Definicja | Prognoza popytu na lata 2026–2030 |
|---|---|---|---|
| V | Recognising confirmation bias Confirmation bias · Selective evidence | Notices that mainly confirming evidence is sought and therefore deliberately looks for counterexamples. | rising |
| V | Recognising anchoring Anchoring bias · Anchor adjustment | Notices that a first figure or proposal steers own judgement and deliberately corrects for it. | rising |
| V | Recognising the availability heuristic Availability heuristic · Recency bias | Notices that recent or striking cases distort judgement about likelihood and magnitude. | rising |
| V | Testing own assumptions with others Seeking challenge · Devil's advocate | Puts own assumptions to someone with a different interest or field and asks for challenge. | rising |
| V | Seeking feedback on own judgement Feedback on reasoning · Judgement review | Asks specifically for feedback on own reasoning and uses it to adjust the judgement. | rising |
| V | Writing a reflection report Reflection report · Reflective writing | Describes in writing which choices were made, their effect and what will be different next time. | stable |
| V | Reconstructing reasoning afterwards Reasoning reconstruction · Decision debrief | Retraces after a decision which steps led to the conclusion and where the reasoning was weak. | rising |
| V | Recognising groupthink in oneself Groupthink · Conformity bias | Notices own opinion drifting with the group and still puts the dissenting view forward. | rising |