G Behavioural competence HF-D1.2-003 transversal 8 umiejętności
Judgement under uncertainty
Weighs the possible explanations when data are missing or conflicting and reaches a reasoned judgement while stating the remaining uncertainty.
W jaki sposób serwis hrmforce to mierzy
- Metoda oceny
- Situational Judgement Test · rho 0.12 (SD 0.11)
- hrmforce narzędzie
- Big Fifty, Competency Check
- Kompetencje (50-ramowe)
- Judgment
- Możliwość szkolenia
- medium
- Prognoza popytu na lata 2026–2030
- rising
Scenario with response options, scored on knowledge or behavioural tendency.
Jest to kryterium selekcji, a nie krótkoterminowy cel programistyczny. Nie należy opracowywać trzy miesięcznego planu programistycznego w tym zakresie.
Kotwice behawioralne
| Poziom | Zachowanie na tym poziomie |
|---|---|
| N1 Guided | Indicates which data are missing when in doubt and proposes a provisional judgement to the manager. works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task |
| N3 Proficient | Forms a judgement on incomplete files, names the assumptions used and states which new fact would change that judgement. sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process |
| N5 Leading | Judges in situations of high uncertainty and opposing interests, accounts for this publicly and revises the judgement on new evidence. sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession |
N2 i N4 celowo nie zostały przypisane do konkretnych punktów odniesienia. Oceniający umieszczają je pomiędzy punktami odniesienia, zgodnie z konwencją O*NET.
Podstawowe umiejętności
Umiejętności te dziedziczą ścieżkę oceny oraz punkty odniesienia behawioralne tej konstrukcji.
| T | Umiejętności | Definicja | Prognoza popytu na lata 2026–2030 |
|---|---|---|---|
| G | Making assumptions explicit Surfacing assumptions | States which assumptions underlie a judgement and indicates how firm those assumptions are. | rising |
| G | Stating uncertainty explicitly Communicating uncertainty | Indicates with a conclusion what is unknown and which caveat therefore belongs to the judgement. | rising |
| G | Estimating a range Range estimation · Confidence interval | Gives a lower and upper bound instead of a single figure and justifies how those were set. | rising |
| G | Weighing conflicting signals Weighing conflicting evidence | Weighs sources and signals that contradict each other and explains why one deserves more weight. | rising |
| G | Revising a provisional judgement Updating judgement | Adjusts an earlier judgement as soon as new data warrant it and records that change. | rising |
| G | Justifying professional judgement Professional judgement · Reasoned justification | Explains which data, standards and trade offs a judgement rests on and where its limits lie. | rising |
| G | Seeking a second opinion when in doubt Second opinion · Peer consultation | Puts a doubtful case to a colleague or expert before a decision is made final. | rising |
| G | Acting when data are missing Acting on incomplete information | Chooses a defensible next step when information is incomplete and names what must still be checked. | rising |