A Ability HF-D1.1-003 transversal 5 kompetencer

Abstract and figural reasoning

Recognises rules and patterns in figures, series or symbols without prior knowledge and applies those rules to new, unfamiliar tasks.

Sådan måler hrmforce dette

Standardised test of verbal, numerical or abstract reasoning.

Dette er et udvælgelseskriterium, ikke et kortsigtet udviklingsmål. Lav ikke en tre-måneders udviklingsplan for dette.

Niveau	Adfærd på dette niveau
N1 Guided	Finds the next step in a short series of figures and explains which rule was used for it. works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task
N3 Proficient	Discovers the underlying rule in unfamiliar material with several changing features and uses it to explain deviations. sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process
N5 Leading	Unravels problems without a known example, formulates a new ordering and shapes it so that peers can build on it. sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession

N2 og N4 er bevidst ikke forankret. Bedømmerne placerer dem mellem forankringerne i overensstemmelse med konventionen i O*NET.

Disse kompetencer arver vurderingsforløbet og adfærdsankrene fra dette konstrukt.

T	Kompetence	Definition	Udsigter for efterspørgslen 2026 til 2030
A	Continuing figure series Figural series · Diagrammatic reasoning	Recognises the rule behind a row of figures and picks the figure that logically continues it.	rising
A	Solving matrix reasoning items Matrix reasoning · Progressive matrices	Determines which rule holds per row and column in a grid of figures and fills the missing cell.	rising
A	Recognising patterns in symbols Symbol patterns · Pattern recognition	Sees regularity in sequences of signs or symbols without needing subject or language knowledge.	rising
A	Inferring rules without prior knowledge Inductive reasoning · Rule induction	Derives a general rule from a small number of examples and applies it to unfamiliar items.	rising
A	Evaluating syllogisms Deductive reasoning · Logical validity	Judges whether a conclusion follows logically from two given statements, apart from personal opinion.	rising