+31 (0)88 88 321 88
V Skill HF-D6.1-006 transversal 7 skills

Learning from mistakes and incidents

Investigates after an error or incident what happened, names the cause without shifting blame and changes the working method on that point.

How hrmforce measures this

Assessment method
Situational Judgement Test · rho 0.12 (SD 0.11)
hrmforce instrument
360 Feedback, Competency Check
Competency (50-framework)
Learning Ability
Trainability
high
Demand outlook 2026 to 2030
stable

Scenario with response options, scored on knowledge or behavioural tendency.

Behavioural anchors

LevelBehaviour at this level
N1 Guided Reports an own error to the supervisor at once and repeats the task following the corrected instruction.
works under supervision and follows instruction · routine, one variable at a time · own task
N3 Proficient Analyses own errors and those of the team, discusses the cause openly in the work meeting and adjusts the agreements.
sets own approach and seeks input proactively · several variables, some ambiguity · own team or process
N5 Leading Ensures incidents are reported safely across the organisation, has causes analysed structurally and works the lessons into policy and standards.
sets the standard and the policy · strategic, under high uncertainty · organisation, value chain or profession

N2 and N4 are deliberately not anchored. Raters place them between the anchors, following the O*NET convention.

Underlying skills

These skills inherit the assessment route and the behavioural anchors of this construct.

TSkillDefinitionDemand outlook 2026 to 2030
V Reporting an incident
Incident reporting
Reports an error, near miss or unsafe situation in the reporting system with facts and time. stable
V Analysing causes after an incident
Root cause analysis
Systematically searches after an error for causes in working method, system and circumstances. rising
V Discussing an error without shifting blame
Owning mistakes
Names own share in an error and searches for causes instead of for someone to blame. rising
V Changing the working method after an error
Corrective change
Changes after an error the own action or agreement at exactly the point that went wrong. rising
V Reporting and analysing a near miss
Near miss reporting
Reports situations that only just went well and uses them to reduce risk before damage occurs. rising
V Reviewing a case with the team
Case review
Brings a case that went wrong to the team and derives a shared improvement agreement from it. rising
V Following up improvement actions after an incident
Corrective action follow up
Checks whether the agreed measure after an incident was actually implemented and works. rising
Free demo